Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sina Moghimi vs Philip Henning Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Moghimi vs Henning analysis and find out who is favored!
Sina Moghimi vs Philip Henning Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Moghimi 0 - 0 Henning
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Moghimi has won 44.14% of points on his second serve, while Henning has won 56.21%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Moghimi, in recent form, has won 54.01% of his opponent's second serve points, while Henning has won 53.7%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.6% and 35.26% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Moghimi has saved 52.73% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Henning has saved 60.8% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Moghimi has won 47.37% of matches played (W/L 9/ 10), with Henning winning 85.45% (W/L 47/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Moghimi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 22/ 18), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 22/ 18). Henning has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 83% (W/L 5/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 12/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Moghimi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.37% of matches (W/L 9/ 10), where as Henning has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 85.45% of matches (W/L 47/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Moghimi has played against opponents with an average rank of 107.21 while Henning has played against players with an average rank of 114.31.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Moghimi has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Henning has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Moghimi has converted 42.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Henning has converted 46.95% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
523
Rank
523
High
23
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
55% (22-18)
Career Total W/L
80% (56-14)
43% (6-8)
YTD W/L
86% (24-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
3
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sina Moghimi | Philip Henning |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (6/8) | 86% (24/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (15/18) | 78% (50/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (148/159) | 59% (360/247) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 92% (12/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 43% (6/8) | 80% (12/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 0.36 |
| Aces Total | 7 | 108 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.1 |
| DFs Total | 41 | 29 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:34 | 1:43:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 96.14 | 105.36 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (606/828) | 69% (1270/1850) |
| 1st Serve W% | 56% (339/606) | 71% (903/1270) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (98/222) | 56% (326/580) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (42/98) | 47% (100/213) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (342/804) | 42% (827/1950) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 43% (6/8) | 86% (24/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (6/14) | 86% (24/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 82% (9/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 75% (6/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 91% (22/20) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 9% (22/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 67% (6/4) |
Sina Moghimi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Sina Moghimi
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
80%
(
51 of
64)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Sina Moghimi
84%
(
46 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
11 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sina Moghimi
Player
Courtney John Lock
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gokberk Saritas
Player
Sina Moghimi
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
56 of
76)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sina Moghimi
Player
Caspar Schuetze
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Martins Rocens
Player
Sina Moghimi
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
51%
(
47 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 5-7 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-0 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Adil Kalyanpur
Player
Sina Moghimi
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
82%
(
37 of
45)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamid Reza Nadaf
Player
Sina Moghimi
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
68 of
106)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
11
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
50%
(
10 of
20)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
60 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Philip Henning Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Siddharth Vishwakarma
43%
(
18 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
100%
(
18 of
18)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
3
Aces
20
1
Double Faults
6
86%
(
42 of
49)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
42 of
49)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
13 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
20 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Maik Steiner
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
5
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
25 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Giuseppe Tresca
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
20 of
35)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Dev Javia
64%
(
69 of
107)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
102)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
55 of
69)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
29 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(7) 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Philip Henning
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
107)
11
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
50 of
59)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
55 of
72)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
21 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
107)
105
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Ishaque Eqbal
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Chirag Duhan
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Kabir Hans
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
93%
(
40 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
15%
(
9 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Philip Henning
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
81%
(
44 of
54)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Moghimi Vs Henning Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
